Author Topic: ECU reflash vs PCV?? - NEED YOUR HELP PLEASE  (Read 6118 times)

Offline Fretka

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 226
  • Country: us
Re: ECU reflash vs PCV?? - NEED YOUR HELP PLEASE
« Reply #15 on: July 25, 2012, 01:57:11 pm »
My beast does not have TC but if I can make an educated guess, the strategy TC uses to maintain traction PROBABLY is:

First action: retard timing (fast and effective to a greater degree).
Second action: lean out intake charge (both might be used in conjunction).
Third action: close flies (last resort and only used when above does not produce required parameters).

The first 2 actions are more seamless.

This last takes somewhat longer time to enact and produces a large "felt" response. Hence its use as a last ditch command.
This explains why loss of fly manipulation still results in an effective TC response.
Wretched excess visited upon an innocent C-14

Offline KaTieM505

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 25
  • Country: 00
Re: ECU reflash vs PCV?? - NEED YOUR HELP PLEASE
« Reply #16 on: December 11, 2012, 02:49:26 pm »
Okay,
I am sitting on a full Area P exhaust, PCv and BMC filter. I do not want to sacrifice the Traction Control.

After those of you that have removed the flies and installed the Power Commander and most importantly, put a few miles on your bike, what is your oval experience with this setup.

Thank you for your time to respond.
Randy